Scan
We scan regulatory change in Türkiye and the EU across your domains.
AI-powered regulatory intelligence for Türkiye and the EU
Regulatory Intelligence,Built Around Your Business.
We don't just tell you what changed. We tell you what it means for your company: whether it applies, where it hits your operations, what is already covered, and what has to happen next.
Impact analysisExample scenario
AI
New regulatory change
Up next
Your company
Not applicableNo matching operations
Impact brief
Example scenario for illustrationEvery result is linked to the official text
Scanning regulatory change across
Türkiye
European Union
Why it matters
We don't just track regulation. We tell you what it means for your company.
An alert only tells you something changed. The value is in knowing the impact: where it hits your operations, what you already cover, and what needs to change.
Regulatory tracking
New regulation published
Amendment to waste management requirements
Your team still has to work out the rest:
Does it apply to us?Where?What changes?Are we covered?Who acts?
Impact on your company
Applies toSite B, waste handling
What changesWaste storage conditions tighten
Already coveredYour procedure meets 2 of 3 new requirements
Next stepUpdate the procedure. Owner: EHS lead, before the effective date.
How it works
From a new regulation to a finished task.
Assess impact
AI checks each change against your company's digital twin and explains the impact in plain language.
Act
Obligations become tasks with owners and deadlines, tracked until they are done.
Regulations are written for everyone. The way they affect your company is not.
Why we're different
A digital twin of your company, built by experts.
Experienced regulatory specialists model your company: legal entities, sites, activities, permits and the controls you already have. Our AI then assesses every change against this twin, so the impact you see reflects how you actually operate.
Built by domain experts
Specialists in sustainability, environment and occupational health and safety set up your company's twin.
Specific to your operations
Not a sector code or a questionnaire. The twin reflects your sites, activities and permits.
Impact you can trace
Every result shows the official text and the part of your company it affects.
The digital twin at work
New change
Legal entity
Türkiye entity
EU entity
Site
Site A
Site B
Site C
Activity
Manufacturing
Storage
Logistics
Process
Surface treatment
Waste handling
Combustion
Permit
Environmental permit
Waste licence
Existing obligation
Emission monitoring
Record-keeping
Internal control
Waste procedure
Inspection routine
Result
Impact
What to do
Example scenarios. Categories are illustrative, not a customer model.
Platform
Every change becomes a clear task.
Your team sees only what applies, what it changes for you, and who has to act by when.
Example data
| Change | Domain | Applicability | Impact on your company | Owner | Status |
|---|
Coverage
Where we work today.
Sustainability & ESGReporting, climate and disclosure obligations
EnvironmentPermits, emissions, waste and water
Occupational health & safetyWorkplace risks, equipment and training
Designed to extend to further regulatory domains over time.
European Union
Türkiye
Resources
Writing on regulatory change.
Article
Regulatory monitoring and regulatory intelligence are not the same thing
Most compliance teams already know when a regulation changes. Alerts arrive, newsletters land, someone forwards a link. The problem is rarely that a change went unnoticed. The problem is what happens in the days after it.
Because an alert only tells you that something changed. It does not tell you whether it changed anything for you.
The work an alert leaves behind
A regulation is written for a category: a type of activity, a class of equipment, a threshold, a sector. It is written without any knowledge of your company. So the moment an alert arrives, someone has to answer a chain of questions that the alert itself cannot answer.
- Does this apply to us at all?
- If it does, which sites, activities or permits does it touch?
- What exactly changes in practice?
- How much of it do our existing procedures already cover?
- What is left to do, who owns it, and by when?
This chain is the actual work. It usually falls to a small number of experienced people, it takes hours per change, and it is repeated for every alert, including the many that turn out not to apply.
Why "does not apply" is the expensive answer
Teams often measure their workload by the changes that do apply. But the changes that do not apply consume just as much time, because you cannot know they are irrelevant until you have checked. And unlike a change you acted on, a change you dismissed leaves nothing behind. Six months later, when an auditor asks why a requirement was not implemented, the reasoning has to be reconstructed from memory.
A decision that cannot be explained later is not really a decision. It is a risk that has been postponed.
What changes when the assessment is company-specific
Regulatory intelligence starts where monitoring stops. Instead of delivering the change, it delivers the consequence of the change for one particular company. That requires something monitoring does not have: a structured picture of how the company actually operates. Which legal entities exist, which sites do what, which processes run under which permits, and which internal controls are already in place.
Once that picture exists, each change can be assessed against it rather than against a sector label. The output is different in kind, not just in detail:
- An applicability decision, with the reasoning attached
- The specific part of the operation affected
- What the existing controls already cover, and what they do not
- The remaining work, with an owner and a deadline
The change that does not apply is just as valuable here, because it arrives already assessed, with the reasoning on record.
A practical way to tell the difference
If you want to know which of the two you currently have, take a change from the last quarter and ask one question: how long did it take between the alert arriving and someone knowing which site was affected?
If the answer is measured in days, you have monitoring. If it is immediate, and the reasoning is written down somewhere an auditor could read, you have intelligence.
Coming soonHow a regulatory Digital Twin is built
Coming soonMaking applicability decisions defensible in an audit
Bring one regulatory question. See its impact on your company.
- See how a change is assessed for a company like yours
- Walk through the impact brief and the actions it creates
- Ask about your domains and how your digital twin is built